Designing Together: How Generative AI Can Support Faculty–Instructional Designer Collaboration in Online Course Development

Authors

  • Carey Borkoski Author
  • Lydia Tippett Author

Keywords:

generative AI, instructional design, faculty-ID collaboration, course development

Abstract

This paper explores how generative AI (GenAI) can enrich collaboration between faculty and instructional designers in online course development. Through personal reflection and a co-developed graduate course, we show how GenAI can support ideation, alignment, and creativity. Discomfort, we argue, is not only inevitable but essential to this work. When used intentionally, GenAI fosters curiosity, experimentation, and deeper dialogue. By reframing GenAI as a partner in meaning-making rather than automation, we invite teams to embrace course design as an evolving, relational process—where connection, not speed, becomes the foundation for innovation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barshay, J. (2024, January 29). Proof points: Most college kids are taking at least one class online, even long after campuses reopened. The Hechinger Report. https://hechingerreport.org/proof-points-most-college-kids-are-taking-at-least-one-class-online-even-long-after-campuses-reopened/

Campbell, K., Schwier, R. A., & Kenny, R. F. (2006). Conversation as inquiry: A conversation with instructional designers. Journal of Learning Design, 1(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v1i3.21

Chen, B., & Carliner, S. (2021). What contributes to collaboration among instructional designers and faculty? Performance Improvement Quarterly, 34(2), 469–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21339

Chai, D. S., Kim, H. S., Kim, K. N., Ha, Y., Shin, S. S. H., & Yoon, S. W. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in instructional system design. SAGE Open, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843251320256

Choi, G. W., Kim, S. H., Lee, D., & Moon, J. (2024). Utilizing generative AI for instructional design: Exploring strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. TechTrends, 68(4), 832–844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00967-w

Choudhury, S., & Pattnaik, S. (2020). Emerging themes in e-learning: A review from the stakeholders’ perspective. Computers and Education, 144, Article 103657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103657

Gordon, D. F. N., Christou, A., Stouraitis, T., Gienger, M., & Vijayakumar, S. (2023). Adaptive assistive robotics: a framework for triadic collaboration between humans and robots. Royal Society Open Science, 10(6), 221617–221617. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221617

Jacobsen, D. M., Clifford, P., & Friesen, S. (2002). Preparing teachers for technology integration: Creating a culture of inquiry in the context of use. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 2(3), 363–388.

Kumar, S., Gunn, A., Rose, R., Pollard, R., Johnson, M., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2024). The Role of Instructional Designers in the Integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Online and Blended Learning in Higher Education. Online Learning, 28(3), 207-231. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.4501

Luo, T., Muljana, P. S., Ren, X., & Young, D. (2024). Exploring instructional designers’ utilization and perspectives on generative AI tools: A mixed methods study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73, 741–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10308-z

Menchaca, M. P., & Bekele, T. A. (2008). Learner and instructor identified success factors in distance education. Distance Education, 29(3), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910802395771

Meyen, E. L., Tangen, P., & Lian, C. H. (1999). Developing online instruction: Partnership between instructors and technical developers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 14(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264349901400102

Moore, S., Hedayati-Mehdiabadi, A., Law, V., & Kang, S. P. (2024). The change we work:

Professional agency and ethics for emerging AI technologies. TechTrends, 68(1), 27–36.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00895-1

Oxford Learning College. (n.d.). The history of distance learning. https://www.oxfordcollege.ac/news/history-of-distance-learning/

Perry, E. H., & Pilati, M. L. (2011). Online learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2011(128), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.472

Rahnama, H. (2025, January 8). AI glossary/dictionary. MIT Media Lab. https://www.media.mit.edu/tools/ai-glossary-dictionary/

Richardson, J. C., Ashby, I., Alshammari, A. N., Cheng, Z., Johnson, B. S., Krause, T. S., Lee, D., Randolph, A. E., & Wang, H. (2019). Faculty and instructional designers on building successful collaborative relationships. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4), 855–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9636-4

Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Stefaniak, J. E., Cha, E. E., Yang, F., Gilstrap, S., & Yang, L. (2025). A comprehensive review of instructional designer research and approaches in learning design.

Educational Technology Research and Development, 73(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10327-w

Watson-Held, H. A., Gray, J., & Grodziak, E. (2024). Promoting positive instructional designer and faculty relations: A case study from a state university. Journal of Educators Online, 21(1), Article n1. https://doi.org/10.9743/jeo.2024.21.1.1

Published

2026-03-16

Data Availability Statement

We have not made our data available but are happy to share if requested.

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories

How to Cite

Designing Together: How Generative AI Can Support Faculty–Instructional Designer Collaboration in Online Course Development. (2026). Journal on Excellence in College Teaching. https://celt.miamioh.edu/index.php/JECT/article/view/1301