Student Attitudes & Perceptions of Learning When Completing Activities That Integrate Generative Artificial Intelligence

Authors

  • Tracie Marcella Addy Rutgers University - New Brunswick Author
  • Crystal Quillen Rutgers University - New Brunswick Author
  • Samantha Luxmikanthan Rutgers University - New Brunswick Author
  • Anna Y. Kornienko Rutgers University - New Brunswick Author
  • Douglas Cantor Rutgers University - New Brunswick Author
  • Xenia K. Morin Rutgers University - New Brunswick Author
  • Ines Rauschenbach Rutgers University - New Brunswick Author
  • Carmela Bernadetta Scala Rutgers University - New Brunswick Author
  • Lyra Stein Rutgers University - New Brunswick Author
  • Jenny Yang Rutgers University - New Brunswick Author

Keywords:

generative AI, student attitudes, skill development, undergraduate education

Abstract

Generative AI (GenAI) technologies directly impact learning environments. This study captures undergraduate student attitudes and perceptions of learning in courses integrating their usage of GenAI across disciplines. Course activities focused on fostering critical thinking skills, scientific writing and communication skills, information literacy skills, storytelling, and gamification. After completing the activities, scores remained relatively stable in students' reported knowledge of, and concerns about, GenAI, and statistically significant differences were seen in students' willingness to use GenAI, as well as by demographics (first-generation, neurodivergent, and disability status). Many students described the value of using GenAI while acknowledging limitations, highlighting complexity within their attitudes.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas, M., Jam, F.A. & Khan, T.I. (2024). Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 21, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7

Addy, T., Kang, T., Laquintano, T., & Dietrich, V. (2023). Who benefits and who is excluded?: transformative learning, equity, and generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Transformative Learning, 10(2), 92-103.

Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8

Chan, C.K.Y., & Zhou, W. (2023). An expectancy value theory (EVT) based instrument for measuring student perceptions of generative AI. Smart Learn. Environ. 10, 64 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00284-4

Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Row, Peterson.

Gallant, T. B., & Rettinger, D. A. (2025). The Opposite of Cheating: Teaching for Integrity in the Age of AI. University of Oklahoma Press.

Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57(3), 1953-1960.

Lee, D., Arnold, M., Srivastava, A., Plastow, K., Strelan, P., Ploeckl, F., ... & Palmer, E. (2024). The impact of generative AI on higher education learning and teaching: A study of educators’ perspectives. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100221.

Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 60-70.

Mollick, E. (2024). Co-intelligence: Living and working with AI. Penguin.

OpenAI. (November 30, 2022). Introducing ChatGPT. OpenAI. https://openai.com/index/chatgpt/

Pew Research Center. (June 23, 2025). 46% of adults under 30 have used ChatGPT to learn; use for work, entertainment is also up since 2023. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/06/25/34-of-us-adults-have-used-chatgpt-about-double-the-share-in-2023/sr_25-06-24_chat-gpt_3/

Rosales, O., Gutierrez, C., & Padilla, A. M. (2024). Understanding the nuances of first-generation college students: How the culture of college factors into academic success. Journal of College Student Development, 65(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2024.a919350

Spatola, N. (2024). The efficiency-accountability tradeoff in AI integration: effects on human performance and over-reliance. Computers in Human Behavior: artificial humans, 2(2), 100099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100099

Stone, B. W. (2024). Generative AI in Higher Education: Uncertain Students, Ambiguous Use Cases, and Mercenary Perspectives. Teaching of Psychology, 52(3), 347-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283241305398

Zhao, X., Cox, A., & Chen, X. (2025). The use of generative AI by students with disabilities in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 66, 101014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101014

Published

2026-03-16

Data Availability Statement

The authors have not made the research data available

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories

How to Cite

Student Attitudes & Perceptions of Learning When Completing Activities That Integrate Generative Artificial Intelligence. (2026). Journal on Excellence in College Teaching. https://celt.miamioh.edu/index.php/JECT/article/view/1296