Assessing Outcomes With Computer-Based vs. Traditional Paper-Based Testing: A Preliminary Study

Authors

  • Gary A. Sforzo Ithaca College Author

Abstract

Examining the effectiveness of computer-based testing (CBT) platforms is often limited by software design, user (student) characteristics, unrealistic test development, and/or implementation requirements. The author evaluated CBT vs. traditional paper-based testing (PBT). To optimize the conditions for this comparison, he integrated CBT into a challenging upper-level college course with computer-savvy students using software that puts control over question design and selection in the hands of the instructor. Thirty-three students produced 196 assessments during a semester-long course; statistical analysis revealed no difference between the two assessment modalities. Furthermore, students' preferences were evaluated further by interview and questionnaire; little preference was indicated for either CBT or PBT administration. These results illustrate that student assessments done outside the classroom in a secure computer assisted testing environment can produce results equivalent to more traditional forms of assessment. Although implementing outside-the-classroom computer-based testing (OC-CBT) offers many potential benefits to teachers and students, the human and budgetary resource costs of implementing it can be great. This study offers relevant information to institutions that are considering adopting OC-CBT.

Published

2024-03-22