Permitted or Prohibited? Mapping AI Use Across University Disciplines

Authors

  • Andrea Arce-Trigatti Tennessee Tech University Author
  • Aimee Klaschus Tallahassee State College Author

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Syllabi policies, Faculty

Abstract

Examining the implementation of AI policies in different disciplines in the postsecondary context is relevant for understanding this changing terrain. This study examines potential disciplinary differences between postsecondary educators’ strictness level in the adoption of AI policies in their courses and use of generative AI in policy creation, using a publicly available dataset that describes syllabi policies for generative AI use at a variety of institutions in the United States. Implications from this study offer insight into AI integration and use based on broader discussions of levels of strictness and ethics in higher education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Awadallah Alkouk, W., & Khlaif, Z. (2024). AI-resistant assessments in higher education: Practical insights from faculty training workshops. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1499495. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1499495

Agresti, A., & Finlay, B. (2009). Statistical methods for the social sciences (4th edition). Pearson.

Arce-Trigatti, A., Klaschus, A., & Silber-Furman, D. (2024). Bytes of responsibility: Building bridges between innovation and integrity. The National Institute for Staff and Organizational Development (NISOD) Paper! Retrieved from https://www.nisod.org/2025/02/26/nisod-papers-no-31-2/

Arney, J., Dale, T., Davis, G., & Kinzie, J. (2023). Radical reimaging for student success in higher education. Routledge.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L., Sorensen Irvine, C., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to research in education (10th edition). Cengage Learning.

Bobula, M. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education: A comprehensive review of challenges, opportunities, and implications. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 30, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi30.1137

Brandon, E., Eaton, L., Gavin, D., & Papini, A. (2025). In the room where it happens: Generative AI policy creation in higher education. Educause Review. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2025/5/in-the-room-where-it-happens-generative-ai-policy-creation-in-higher-education

Choi, G.W., Kim, S.H., Lee, D., & Moon, J. (2024). Utilizing generative AI for instructional design: exploring strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. TechTrends, 68, 832-844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00967-w

Dotan, R., Parker, L. S., & Radzilowicz, J. G. (2024). Responsible adoption of generative AI in higher education: Developing a “points to consider” approach based on faculty perspectives. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’24) (pp. 1–14). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3659023

Dringó-Horváth, I., Rajki, Z., & T. Nagy, J. (2025). University teachers’ digital competence and AI literacy: Moderating role of gender, age, experience, and discipline. Education Sciences, 15(7), 868. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070868

Duke University. (2024). Artificial intelligence policies: Guidelines and considerations. Duke: Learning Innovation and Lifetime Education. Retrieved from https://lile.duke.edu/ai-and-teaching-at-duke-2/artificial-intelligence-policies-in-syllabi-guidelines-and-considerations/

Eaton, L. (2024). Syllabi policies for AI generative tools. [Open, crowd-sourced document]. Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RMVwzjc1o0Mi8Blw_-JUTcXv02b2WRH86vw7mi16W3U/edit?tab=t.0

Feisler, C. (2023, May 06). The ethics of AI. The Institute for Science and Policy. Retrieved 31 October. 2024, from https://institute.dmns.org/perspectives/posts/the-ethics-of-ai/.

Mills, A., Bali, M., & Eaton, L. (2023). How do we respond to generative AI in education? Open educational practices give us a framework for an ongoing process. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 16-31. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.34

Parnell, A. (2024). The challenges and opportunities of data-informed strategies: 4 considerations for the future. Florida Association of Institutional Research, Annual Conference. Virtual, February 24, 2024.

Perkins, M., Furze, L., Roe, J., & MacVaugh, J. (2024). The Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS): A framework for ethical integration of Generative AI in Educational Assessment. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(6), 49–66. Retrieved from https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.T2024092900003300954126858

Robert, J. (2024, February 26). The future of AI in higher education. 2024 EDUCAUSE AI Landscape Study. Retrieved from https://www.educause.edu/ecar/research-publications/2024/2024-educause-ai-landscape-study/the-future-of-ai-in-higher-education

Saihi, A., Ben-Daya, M. & Hariga, M. (2025). The moderating role of technology proficiency and academic discipline in AI-chatbot adoption within higher education: Insights from a PLS-SEM analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 5843–5881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13023-0

Siregar, N. (2025, June 23). The role of AI in business: Insights and challenges for 2025. Hostinger. Retrieved from https://www.hostinger.com/tutorials/ai-in-business.

Published

2026-03-16

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories

How to Cite

Permitted or Prohibited? Mapping AI Use Across University Disciplines. (2026). Journal on Excellence in College Teaching. https://celt.miamioh.edu/index.php/JECT/article/view/1314