Learning Logs: A Tool for Coaching Students to Assess and Regulate Their Own Learning
Keywords:
self-regulated learning, reflective learning, self-assessmentAbstract
This article describes the implementation and evaluation of a novel assessment tool, called a Learning Log (LL), in a pharmacy curriculum. LLs were designed to provide the framework and guidance necessary for students to gain skills in self-regulated learning (SRL). The weekly LLs included student self-assessment of progress toward learning outcomes, reflection, planning with task-selection guidance, and targeted practice. Both perception and usage data confirm that LLs effectively train students to assess and regulate their own learning. Reflection comments show that SRL habits cultivated by LLs were useful in other coursework, improved student performance, and promoted time management skills.
Downloads
References
Butler, D. L., & Brydges, R. (2013). Learning in the health professions: What does self-regulation have to do with it? Medical Education, 47(11), 1053-1057. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12307
Chou, C., & Zou, N. (2020). An analysis of internal and external feedback in self-regulated learning activities mediated by self-regulated learning tools and open learner models. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00233-y
Cleary, T. J., Callan, G. L., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). Assessing self-regulation as a cyclical context-specific phenomenon: Overview and analysis of SRL microanalytic protocols. Education Research International, 2012, Article 428639. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/428639
Colthart, I., et al. (2008). The effectiveness of self-assessment on the identification of learner needs, learner activity, and impact on clinical practice: BEME Guide no. 10. Medical Teacher, 30(2), 124-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701881699
Davis, D. A., et al. (2006). Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: A systematic review. JAMA, 296(9), 1094-1102. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.9.1094
Devore, S., Stuart, S., & Riall, A. (2008). Universal design for instruction: A matter of equitable access to learning. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 19(2-3), 87-106. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ894378
Diefes-Dux, H. A., & Cruz Castro, L. M. (2022). Reflection types and students' viewing of feedback in a first-year engineering course using standards-based grading. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(2), 283-307. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20452
Dill, W. (2018). Exploring students’ use of learning contracts in preparing for the national athletic training board certification examination (Doctoral dissertation, Lindenwood University). ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Fung, C. Y., Abdulla, M. N. L. Y., & Hashim, S. (2019). Improving self-regulated learning through personalized weekly e-learning journals: A time series quasi-experimental study. e-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 13(1), 30-45. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1239150
Gandomkar, R., & Sandars, J. (2018). Clearing the confusion about self-directed learning and self-regulated learning. Medical Teacher, 40(8), 862-863. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2018.1425382
Howitz, W. J., McKnelly, J. K., & Link, R. D. (2021). Developing and implementing a specifications grading system in an organic chemistry laboratory course. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(2), 385-394. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00450
Khiat, H., & Vogel, S. (2022). A self-regulated learning management system: Enhancing performance, motivation, and reflection in learning. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 19(2), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.19.2.4
Kicken, W., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (2008). Scaffolding advice on task selection: A safe path toward self-directed learning in on-demand education. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 60(3), 223-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820802305561
Kostons, D., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2012). Training self-assessment and task-selection skills: A cognitive approach to improving self-regulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 121-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.004
Kusurkar, R. A., Croiset, G., & Cate, T. J. T. (2011). Twelve tips to stimulate intrinsic motivation in students through autonomy-supportive classroom teaching derived from self-determination theory. Medical Teacher, 33(12), 978-982. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2011.599896
Linkous, H. M. (2020, October 27-30). Self-directed learning and self-regulated learning: What's the difference? A literature analysis. Presented at the American Association for Adult and Continuing Education Conference Online. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED611648
Lucieer, S. M., et al. (2016). Self-regulated learning and academic performance in medical education. Medical Teacher, 38(6), 585-593. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2015.1073240
Neufeld, A., & Malin, G. (2020). How medical students’ perceptions of instructor autonomy-support mediate their motivation and psychological well-being. Medical Teacher, 42(6), 650-656. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2020.1726308
Nilson, L. B. (2013). Creating self-regulated learners: Strategies to strengthen students' self-awareness and learning skills. Stylus Publishing.
Nilson, L. B. (2015). Specifications grading: Restoring rigor, motivating students, and saving faculty time. Stylus Publishing.
Norton, M. N., et al. (2020). Students and faculty perceptions of standards-based grading for clinical education. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 16(1), 16-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2020.08.002
Pate, A., et al. (2019). The use of exam wrappers to promote metacognition. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 11(4), 492-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2019.02.008
Pope, L., Parker, H. B., & Ultsch, S. (2020). Assessment of specifications grading in an undergraduate dietetics course. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 52(5), 439-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2019.07.017
Robinson, J. D., & Persky, A. M. (2020). Developing self-directed learners. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(3), Article 847512. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe847512
Saks, K., & Leijen, A. (2014). Distinguishing self-directed and self-regulated learning and measuring them in the e-learning context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 190-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1155
Sandars, J., & Cleary, T. J. (2011). Self-regulation theory: Applications to medical education: AMEE Guide No. 58. Medical Teacher, 33(11), 875-886. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2011.595434
Sein, A., et al. (2021). Twelve tips for embedding assessment for and as learning practices in a programmatic assessment system. Medical Teacher, 43(3), 300-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2020.1789081
Sethares, K. A., & Asselin, M. E. (2021). Use of exam wrapper metacognitive strategy to promote student self-assessment of learning. Nurse Educator, 47(1), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000001026
Smith, B. A., Metzger, K., & Soneral, P. (2019). Investigating introductory nonmajor biology students' self-regulated learning strategies through the implementation of a reflective-routine. Journal of College Science Teaching, 48(6), 66-76. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst19_048_06_66
Thomas, L., Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L. (2016). Using concept maps and goal-setting to support the development of self-regulated learning in a problem-based learning curriculum. Medical Teacher, 38(9), 930-935. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2015.1132408
van Schaik, S., Plant, J., & O'Sullivan, P. (2013). Promoting self-directed learning through portfolios in undergraduate medical education: The mentors’ perspective. Medical Teacher, 35(2), 139-144. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2012.733832
White, C. B., & Fantone, J. C. (2010). Pass-fail grading: Laying the foundation for self-regulated learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(4), 469-477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-009-9211-1
Yan, Z. (2020). Self-assessment in the process of self-regulated learning and its relationship with academic achievement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 224-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1629390
Yoon, M., Hill, J., & Kim, D. (2021). Designing supports for promoting self-regulated learning in the flipped classroom. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 33(2), 398-418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09269-z
Zheng, B., Ward, A., & Stanulis, R. (2020). Self-regulated learning in a competency-based and flipped learning environment: Learning strategies across achievement levels and years. Medical Education Online, 25(1), 1686949. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1686949
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
At this time, I have not made the research data publicly available.
License
Access Agreement Journal on Excellence in College Teaching
Before proceeding you must agree to the terms and conditions of usage as outlined below by clicking on the Accept button and/or by both parties’ signatures below. You will have to do this only once. After agreement, you will be redirected back to the main Journal page. A pdf copy of the terms is available for download.
This Access Agreement (the "Agreement") is effective upon processing of payment ("Effective Date") and is entered into by and between the Journal on Excellence in College Teaching (“JECT”) and the Customer (“Customer").
This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and supersedes and voids all prior communications, understandings, and agreements relating to the Product(s), including any terms of use displayed to Authorized Users via the online site of the Product(s). Alterations to the Agreement and to any Addendum to the Agreement are only valid and binding if they are recorded in writing and signed by both parties
. I. Definitions
"Authorized Users" shall mean individuals who are authorized by the Customer (which shall include those individuals authorized by the Institutions hereunder) to access the Customer's information services whether on-site or off-site via secure authentication and who are affiliated with the Customer as a student (undergraduates and postgraduates), employee (whether on a permanent or temporary basis), or a contractor of the Customer. Individuals who are not a current student, employee, or a contractor of the Customer, but who are permitted to access the Customer's information services from computer terminals within the physical premises of the Customer ("Walk-In Users"), are also deemed to be Authorized Users, but only for the time they are within the physical premises of the Customer. Walk-In Users may not be given means to access the Product(s) when they are not within the physical premises of the Customer.
"Commercial Use" shall mean use for the purpose of monetary reward (whether by or for the Customer or an Authorized User) by means of the sale, resale, loan, transfer, hire, or other form of exploitation of the Product(s). For the avoidance of doubt, neither recovery of direct cost by the Customer from Authorized Users, nor use by the Customer or Authorized Users of the Product(s) in the course of research funded by a commercial organization, shall be deemed to constitute Commercial Use.
"Educational Purposes" shall mean for the purpose of education, teaching, distance learning, private study and/or research as described in Section II below.
"Institutions" shall mean the Customer's participating institutions, if applicable.
"License" shall mean the non-exclusive, non-transferable right to access and use the Product(s) pursuant to the specific terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.
"Product(s)" shall mean the products, materials and/or information contained therein that are subject to this Agreement. Product(s) include the Journal on Excellence in College Teaching and the archive of the Learning Communities Journal.
"Reasonable Amount" shall be determined based on guidelines set forth by 17 U.S. Code § 107 (Limitations on exclusive rights, Fair use).
"Secure Authentication" shall mean access to the Product(s) by Internet Protocol ("IP") ranges or by another means of authentication agreed between the Publisher and Customer or Institutions (if applicable) from time to time.
II. Authorized Use of Product(s)
Customer, the Institutions (if applicable), and Authorized Users may use the Product(s) for Educational Purposes as follows:
Analysis. Authorized Users shall be permitted to extract or use information contained in the Product(s) for Educational Purposes, including, but not limited to, text and data mining, extraction and manipulation of information for the purposes of illustration, explanation, example, comment, criticism, teaching, research, or analysis.
Course Packs. Customer, the Institutions, and Authorized Users may use a Reasonable Amount of the Product(s) in the preparation of course packs or other educational materials.
Digital Copy. Customer, the Institutions, and Authorized Users may download and digitally copy a Reasonable Amount of the Product(s).
Display. Customer, the Institutions, and Authorized Users shall have the right to electronically display the Product(s) to the extent necessary to further the intent and purpose of this Agreement.
Electronic Reserve. Customer, the Institutions, and Authorized Users may use a Reasonable Amount of each of the Product(s) in connection with specific courses of instruction offered by Customer.
Interlibrary Loan. The Customer and the Institutions shall be permitted to use Reasonable Amounts of the Content to fulfill occasional requests from other, non-participating institutions, a practice commonly called Interlibrary Loan ("ILL"). Customer and the Institutions shall fulfill such requests in compliance with Section 108 of the United States Copyright Law (17 USC S108, "Limitations on exclusive rights: Reproduction by libraries and archives") and the Guidelines for the Proviso of Subsection 108(2g)(2) prepared by the National Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted Works (CONTU).
The electronic form of the Product(s) may be used as a source for ILL. Customer and the Institutions shall include copyright notices on all ILL transmissions. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in no event shall any non-secure electronic transmission of files be permitted.
Print Copy. Customer, the Institutions, and Authorized Users may print a Reasonable Amount of the Product(s).
Recover Copying Costs. Customer and the Institutions may charge a reasonable fee to cover costs of copying or printing portions of Product(s) for Authorized Users.
Scholarly Sharing. Authorized Users may transmit to a third party colleague in hard copy or electronically, Reasonable Amounts of the Product(s) for personal use, professional use, or Educational Purposes but in no event for Commercial Use. In addition, Authorized Users have the right to use, with appropriate credit, figures, tables, and brief excerpts from the Product(s) in the Authorized User's own scientific, scholarly, and educational works.
Text Mining. Authorized Users may use the licensed material to perform and engage in text mining/data mining activities for legitimate academic research and other Educational Purposes. Those uses beyond educational use shall require permission from the Publisher.
III. Restrictions
Except as provided herein, the institution shall make reasonable efforts to inform its authorized users not to use, alter, decompile, modify, display, or distribute the Product(s) as follows:
Alter Identification. Remove, obscure, or modify copyright notices, text acknowledging, attributions, or other means of identification or disclaimers as they appear. Alter Product(s).
Alter, decompile, adapt, or modify the Product(s), except to the extent necessary to make it perceptible on a computer screen, or as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Alteration of words or their order is strictly prohibited.
Commercial Use. No Commercial Use of the Product(s) shall be permitted unless the Customer or an Authorized User has been granted prior written consent by an authorized representative of the Product(s). Use of all or any part of the Product(s) for any Commercial Use or for any purpose other than Educational Purposes.
Distribution. Display or distribute any part of the Product(s) on any electronic network, including without limitation, the Internet, and any other distribution medium now in existence or hereinafter created, other than by a Secure Authentication; print and distribute any portion(s) of the Product(s)s to persons or entities other than the Customer or Authorized Users, except as provided in Section II.
JECT acknowledges that the Customer cannot police or control the actions of its students, faculty, and other Authorized Users with respect to their use of the Product(s). In the event of abuse, the institution shall make prompt and reasonable efforts to heal the breach and notify the publisher.
IV. Term and Termination
This agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall remain in effect unless and until terminated as permitted herein (the "Term"). There is no perpetual electronic access to content made available during the term of the agreement.
JECT may terminate this Agreement if Customer violates any of the terms and conditions set forth herein. In the event of any termination of access, JECT will promptly notify the Customer of the basis for termination.
The Customer may terminate this Agreement if sufficient funds are not provided or allotted in future government-approved budgets of the Customer (or reasonably available or expected to become available from other sources at the time the Customer’s payment obligation attaches) to permit the Subscriber, in the exercise of its reasonable administrative discretion, to continue this Agreement.
In the event of any unauthorized use of the Product(s) by an Authorized User, Customer shall cooperate with JECT in the investigation of any unauthorized use of the Product(s) of which it is made aware and shall use reasonable efforts to remedy such unauthorized use and prevent its recurrence. JECT may terminate such Authorized User's access to the Product(s) after first providing reasonable notice to the Customer (in no event less than two (2) weeks) and cooperating with the Customer to avoid recurrence of any unauthorized use. In the event of any termination of access, JECT will promptly notify the Customer
. V. Refunds
In the event that a subscription is canceled by the Customer prior to the subscription end date, the following will be used as guidelines for refunds.
Electronic subscriptions. The Customer shall be entitled to a full refund within 14 days of the start of the most recent subscription term. Refunds requested after 14 days but no later than 60 days from the start of the most recent subscription term will be allowed, minus a 30% processing fee. Refunds will not be granted if requested more than 60 days after the start of the most recent subscription term.
