The Cultural Climate of Effective Groups in Online Courses
Keywords:
online, engagement, group workAbstract
This study examines the cultural climate of successful groups in online undergraduate sociology courses that developed social contracts aimed at fostering positive group work experiences and academic achievement. An analysis of participants’ group assessment papers investigated the most important attributes of group cultures with congenial work environments. Qualitative findings revealed that the hallmarks of effective groups included strong leadership, a commitment to ongoing contact, a sharing of the workload, a strong work ethic, respect among members, and increased knowledge of course content.
Downloads
References
Alvarez-Bell, R. M., Wirtz, D., & Bian, H. (2017). Identifying keys to success in innovative teaching: Student engagement and practices as predictors of student learning in a course using team-based learning approach. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 5(2), 128-147. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.2.10
Bakir, N., Humpherys, S., & Dana, K. (2020). Students’ perceptions of challenges and solutions to face-to-face and online group work. Information Systems Education Journal, 18(5), 75-88.
Barbetta, P. M. (2022). Technologies as tools to increase active learning during online higher-education instruction. Journal of Education Technology Systems, 51(3), 317-339. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395221143969
Brannen, S. F., Beauchamp, D., Cartwright, N. M., Liddle, D. M., Tishinsky, J. M., Newton, G., & Monk, J. M. (2021). Effectiveness of group work contracts in facilitate collaborative group learning and reduce anxiety in traditional face-to-face lecture and online distance education course formats. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(2), 150205. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2021.150205
Callister, R. R. and Love, M. S. (2016). A comparison of learning outcomes in skills-based courses: Online versus face-to-face formats. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(2), 243-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12093
Carroll, N., Lang, M., & Connolly, C. (2024). An extended community of inquiry framework supporting students in online and digital education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2326658
Carter, I., Damianakis, T., Munro, S., Skinner, H., Matin, S., & Andrews, T. N. (2018). Exploring online and blended course delivery in social group work. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 30(5), 486-503. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2018.1523824
de-Saint Léger, D. & Mullan, K. (2014). “A good all-round French Workout “or “massive stress”? Perceptions of group work among tertiary learners of French. Systems, 44, 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.03.005
Dogan, S., Celik, I., Unal, A., & Dogan, N. A. (2023) Employing the community of inquiry framework in an asynchronous graduate course for teachers. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 12(4). https://edtechbooks.org/jaid_12_4/employing_the_community_of_inquiry_framework_in_an_asynchronous_graduate_course_for_teachers
Doğuer, G. N. and Öner, D. (2023). Examining sense of community in the pandemic: A case of an online course. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 6(3), 602-624. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1232789
Donelan, H. & Kear, K. (2024) Online group projects in higher education: Persistent challenges and implications for practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 36(2):435-468. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s12528-023-09360-7
Eklund, M. & Isotalus, P. (2024) Having it both ways: Learning communication skills in face-to-face and online environments. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1270164. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1270164
Fabriz, S., Mendzheritskaya, J., & Stehle, S. (2021). Impact of synchronous and asynchronous settings of online teaching and learning in higher education students’ learning experience during COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733554
Flores, R. & Bauman, A. (2024) Group and team work. Elgar.
Gaffney, M. (2008). Participatory action research: An overview -- What makes it tick? Kairaranga, 9(3), 9-15.
Garrison, D. R. (2017) E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Company.
Grant-Vallone, E. J. (2011). Successful group work: Using cooperative learning and team-based learning in the classroom. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 21(4), 99-121.
Haber-Curran, P. and Dean-Scott, S. (2022) Learner-centered pedagogical practices that facilitate engagement and learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 33(3), 95-122.
Hehir, E., Zeller, M., Luckhurst, J., & Chandler, T. (2021) Developing student connectedness under remote learning using digital resources: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 6531-6548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10577-1
Hennessy, D. & Evans, R. (2006) Small-group learning in the community college classroom. Community College Enterprise, 12(1), 93-110.
Hunter, S. B., Moran, H. B., Mullican, K. N., & Connor, L. A. (2019). Enjoyable group projects? Utilizing course design and technology to create meaningful undergrad¬uate group work. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 30(2), 55-77.
Johnson, B., Ulseth, R., Smith, C., & Fox, D. (2015, October 21-24). The impacts of project based learning on self-directed learning and professional skill attainment: A comparison of project based learning to traditional engineering education. In 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), El Paso, TX, United States. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2015.7344028
Jones, S. H. (2015). Benefits and challenges of online education for clinical social work: Three examples. Clinical Social Work Journal, 43, 225-235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-014-0508-z
Jordan, M. E. & Daniel, S. R. (2010) Heedful interrelating in the academic discourse of collaborative groups. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 45(2), 4-19.
Kendall, M. E. (1999). Let students do the work. College Teaching, 47(3), 84-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567559909595791
Major, C. (2023). Community beyond proximity: Facilitating community in an online course. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 34(4), 7-27.
McAllister, C. (2013). A process evaluation of an online BSW program: Getting the student perspective. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(4-5), 514-530. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2013.838200
Merlin, M. D., Lavioe, S., & Gallagher, F. (2020). Elements of group dynamics that influence learning in small groups in undergraduate students: A scoping review. Nurse Education Today, 87. https://doi.org/10.1016.j.nedt.2020.104362
Monson, R. A. (2019). Do they have to like it to learn from it? Students’ experiences, group dynamics, and learning outcomes in group research projects. Teaching Sociology, 47(2), 116-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X18812549
Mudau, P. K. & Van den Berg, G. (2023) Guidelines for supporting a community of inquiry through graded online discussions forums in higher education. Education Sciences, 13(9), 963. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090963
Myers, S. A., Bogdan, L. M., Eidsness, M. A., Johnson, A. N., Schoo, M. E., Smith, N. A., Thompson, M. R., & Zachery B. A. (2009). Taking a trait approach to understanding college students’ perceptions of group work. College Student Journal, 43(3), 822-831.
Office of Curriculum, Assessment and Teaching Transformation. (n.d.). Community of inquiry. University at Buffalo. https://www.buffalo.edu/catt/develop/teach/learning-environments/community-of-inquiry.html
Okech, D., Barner, J., Segoshi, M., & Carney, M. (2014). MSW student experiences in online vs. face-to-face teaching formats? Social Work Education: The International Journal, 33(1), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-014-0508-z
Olaniyi, N., Millward, D., & Peoples, C. (2023) An analysis of team projects outcomes from student and instructor perspectives in online computing degrees. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 25(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2023-0001
Ortiz, A. Y., Gray, N., Kuborn, S., & Caldwell, J. (2022). Comparison of course learning outcomes online vs. face-to-face: A case study. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 33(3), 69-94.
Otto, S., Bertel, L. B., Lyngdorf, N. E. R., Markman, A. O., Anderson, T., Ryberg, T. (2024) Emerging digital practices supporting student-centered learning environments in higher education: A review of literature and lessons learned from the Covid-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 1673-1696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11789-3
Oyarzun, B. & Martin, F. (2023). A systematic review of research on online learner collaboration from 2012-21: Collaboration technologies, design, facilitation, and outcomes. Online Learning, 27(1), 71-106. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3407
Parrish, C. W., Guffey, S. K., & Williams, D. S. (2023) The impact of team-based learning on students’ perceptions of classroom community. Active Learning in Higher Education, 24(2), 169-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874211035078
Payne, B. R. & Monk-Turner, B. (2006). Students’ perceptions of group projects: The role of race, age, and slacking. College Student Journal, 40, 132-139.
Peddibhotla, N. & Jani, A. (2019) How group size and structure of online discussion forums influence student engagement and learning, 48(2), 225-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239519877614
Pederson, D. E. (2010). Active collaborative learning in an undergraduate sociological theory course. Teaching Sociology, 38(3), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X10370119
Polyakova-Norwood, V., Creed, J., Patterson, B., & Heiney, S. (2023) Making group work gratifying: Implementing and evaluating a three-stage model of group processes in an online nursing course. Journal of Professional Nursing, 46, 13-18. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.02.004
Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2021) An approach for scaffolding students peer-learning self-regulation strategy in he online component of blended learning. IEEE Access, 9, 30721-30738. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3059916
Rezaei, A. (2017). Features of successful group work in online and physical courses. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 17(3), 5-22.
Savignano, M. & Holbrook, J. (2023) Increasing community in a HyFlex class during COVID-19. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 52(2), 187-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395231205212
Sayegh, J. & Rigopoulos, A. (2023) Improving student learning outcomes through formally structured groups projects. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 47(5), 369-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2022.2043203
Slagter van Tyron, P. J. & Bishop, M. (2009). Theoretical foundations for enhancing social connectedness in online learning environments. Distance Education, 30(3), 291-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910903236312
Sugino, C. (2021). Student perceptions of a synchronous online cooperative learning course in a Japanese women’s university during COVID-19 Pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(5), 231. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050231
Vaishnav, S., Galvin, A., & Kim, T. (2023) Fostering a sense of social connected ness for minoritized students and faculty in online learning. Journal of Technology in Counselor Education and Supervision, 3(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.61888/2692-4129.1068
Vogel, N. & Wood, E. (2023) Collaborative group work: University students’ perceptions and experiences before and during COVID-19. SN Social Sciences, 3(6), 86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-023-00670-2
Wallace, L., McKean, J., Mahan-Hays, S., & Casebolt, J. (2023). On moving forward: Student perspectives on virtual learning frameworks amid COVID-19 pandemic. AURCO Journal, 29, 75-115.
Ward-Smith, P., Pederson, G., & Schmer, C. (2010). Master’s student perceptions of group projects. Nurse Educator, 35(2), 79-83. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0b013e3181ced87e
Wilson, E.M. & Berge, Z.L. (2023) Educational experience and instructional design effectiveness within the community of inquiry framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 24(1), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i1.6751
Xu, Z., Zhou, X., Watts, J., & Kogut, A. (2023) The effect of student engagement strategies in online instruction for data management skills. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 10267-10284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11572-w
Yang, X. (2023) Creating learning personas for collaborative learning in higher education: A Q methodology approach. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 4, 100250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100250
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Access Agreement Journal on Excellence in College Teaching
Before proceeding you must agree to the terms and conditions of usage as outlined below by clicking on the Accept button and/or by both parties’ signatures below. You will have to do this only once. After agreement, you will be redirected back to the main Journal page. A pdf copy of the terms is available for download.
This Access Agreement (the "Agreement") is effective upon processing of payment ("Effective Date") and is entered into by and between the Journal on Excellence in College Teaching (“JECT”) and the Customer (“Customer").
This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and supersedes and voids all prior communications, understandings, and agreements relating to the Product(s), including any terms of use displayed to Authorized Users via the online site of the Product(s). Alterations to the Agreement and to any Addendum to the Agreement are only valid and binding if they are recorded in writing and signed by both parties
. I. Definitions
"Authorized Users" shall mean individuals who are authorized by the Customer (which shall include those individuals authorized by the Institutions hereunder) to access the Customer's information services whether on-site or off-site via secure authentication and who are affiliated with the Customer as a student (undergraduates and postgraduates), employee (whether on a permanent or temporary basis), or a contractor of the Customer. Individuals who are not a current student, employee, or a contractor of the Customer, but who are permitted to access the Customer's information services from computer terminals within the physical premises of the Customer ("Walk-In Users"), are also deemed to be Authorized Users, but only for the time they are within the physical premises of the Customer. Walk-In Users may not be given means to access the Product(s) when they are not within the physical premises of the Customer.
"Commercial Use" shall mean use for the purpose of monetary reward (whether by or for the Customer or an Authorized User) by means of the sale, resale, loan, transfer, hire, or other form of exploitation of the Product(s). For the avoidance of doubt, neither recovery of direct cost by the Customer from Authorized Users, nor use by the Customer or Authorized Users of the Product(s) in the course of research funded by a commercial organization, shall be deemed to constitute Commercial Use.
"Educational Purposes" shall mean for the purpose of education, teaching, distance learning, private study and/or research as described in Section II below.
"Institutions" shall mean the Customer's participating institutions, if applicable.
"License" shall mean the non-exclusive, non-transferable right to access and use the Product(s) pursuant to the specific terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.
"Product(s)" shall mean the products, materials and/or information contained therein that are subject to this Agreement. Product(s) include the Journal on Excellence in College Teaching and the archive of the Learning Communities Journal.
"Reasonable Amount" shall be determined based on guidelines set forth by 17 U.S. Code § 107 (Limitations on exclusive rights, Fair use).
"Secure Authentication" shall mean access to the Product(s) by Internet Protocol ("IP") ranges or by another means of authentication agreed between the Publisher and Customer or Institutions (if applicable) from time to time.
II. Authorized Use of Product(s)
Customer, the Institutions (if applicable), and Authorized Users may use the Product(s) for Educational Purposes as follows:
Analysis. Authorized Users shall be permitted to extract or use information contained in the Product(s) for Educational Purposes, including, but not limited to, text and data mining, extraction and manipulation of information for the purposes of illustration, explanation, example, comment, criticism, teaching, research, or analysis.
Course Packs. Customer, the Institutions, and Authorized Users may use a Reasonable Amount of the Product(s) in the preparation of course packs or other educational materials.
Digital Copy. Customer, the Institutions, and Authorized Users may download and digitally copy a Reasonable Amount of the Product(s).
Display. Customer, the Institutions, and Authorized Users shall have the right to electronically display the Product(s) to the extent necessary to further the intent and purpose of this Agreement.
Electronic Reserve. Customer, the Institutions, and Authorized Users may use a Reasonable Amount of each of the Product(s) in connection with specific courses of instruction offered by Customer.
Interlibrary Loan. The Customer and the Institutions shall be permitted to use Reasonable Amounts of the Content to fulfill occasional requests from other, non-participating institutions, a practice commonly called Interlibrary Loan ("ILL"). Customer and the Institutions shall fulfill such requests in compliance with Section 108 of the United States Copyright Law (17 USC S108, "Limitations on exclusive rights: Reproduction by libraries and archives") and the Guidelines for the Proviso of Subsection 108(2g)(2) prepared by the National Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted Works (CONTU).
The electronic form of the Product(s) may be used as a source for ILL. Customer and the Institutions shall include copyright notices on all ILL transmissions. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in no event shall any non-secure electronic transmission of files be permitted.
Print Copy. Customer, the Institutions, and Authorized Users may print a Reasonable Amount of the Product(s).
Recover Copying Costs. Customer and the Institutions may charge a reasonable fee to cover costs of copying or printing portions of Product(s) for Authorized Users.
Scholarly Sharing. Authorized Users may transmit to a third party colleague in hard copy or electronically, Reasonable Amounts of the Product(s) for personal use, professional use, or Educational Purposes but in no event for Commercial Use. In addition, Authorized Users have the right to use, with appropriate credit, figures, tables, and brief excerpts from the Product(s) in the Authorized User's own scientific, scholarly, and educational works.
Text Mining. Authorized Users may use the licensed material to perform and engage in text mining/data mining activities for legitimate academic research and other Educational Purposes. Those uses beyond educational use shall require permission from the Publisher.
III. Restrictions
Except as provided herein, the institution shall make reasonable efforts to inform its authorized users not to use, alter, decompile, modify, display, or distribute the Product(s) as follows:
Alter Identification. Remove, obscure, or modify copyright notices, text acknowledging, attributions, or other means of identification or disclaimers as they appear. Alter Product(s).
Alter, decompile, adapt, or modify the Product(s), except to the extent necessary to make it perceptible on a computer screen, or as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Alteration of words or their order is strictly prohibited.
Commercial Use. No Commercial Use of the Product(s) shall be permitted unless the Customer or an Authorized User has been granted prior written consent by an authorized representative of the Product(s). Use of all or any part of the Product(s) for any Commercial Use or for any purpose other than Educational Purposes.
Distribution. Display or distribute any part of the Product(s) on any electronic network, including without limitation, the Internet, and any other distribution medium now in existence or hereinafter created, other than by a Secure Authentication; print and distribute any portion(s) of the Product(s)s to persons or entities other than the Customer or Authorized Users, except as provided in Section II.
JECT acknowledges that the Customer cannot police or control the actions of its students, faculty, and other Authorized Users with respect to their use of the Product(s). In the event of abuse, the institution shall make prompt and reasonable efforts to heal the breach and notify the publisher.
IV. Term and Termination
This agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall remain in effect unless and until terminated as permitted herein (the "Term"). There is no perpetual electronic access to content made available during the term of the agreement.
JECT may terminate this Agreement if Customer violates any of the terms and conditions set forth herein. In the event of any termination of access, JECT will promptly notify the Customer of the basis for termination.
The Customer may terminate this Agreement if sufficient funds are not provided or allotted in future government-approved budgets of the Customer (or reasonably available or expected to become available from other sources at the time the Customer’s payment obligation attaches) to permit the Subscriber, in the exercise of its reasonable administrative discretion, to continue this Agreement.
In the event of any unauthorized use of the Product(s) by an Authorized User, Customer shall cooperate with JECT in the investigation of any unauthorized use of the Product(s) of which it is made aware and shall use reasonable efforts to remedy such unauthorized use and prevent its recurrence. JECT may terminate such Authorized User's access to the Product(s) after first providing reasonable notice to the Customer (in no event less than two (2) weeks) and cooperating with the Customer to avoid recurrence of any unauthorized use. In the event of any termination of access, JECT will promptly notify the Customer
. V. Refunds
In the event that a subscription is canceled by the Customer prior to the subscription end date, the following will be used as guidelines for refunds.
Electronic subscriptions. The Customer shall be entitled to a full refund within 14 days of the start of the most recent subscription term. Refunds requested after 14 days but no later than 60 days from the start of the most recent subscription term will be allowed, minus a 30% processing fee. Refunds will not be granted if requested more than 60 days after the start of the most recent subscription term.
