From Classroom to Client: Empowering Gen Z Through Collective Genius at Miami University
Keywords:
social learning, agentic engagement, Experiential Learning, Gen Z learning styles, interdisciplinary teachingAbstract
Generation Z enters college with expectations that call for innovative teaching approaches. This article presents a case study of the First-Year Integrated Core (FYIC) at Miami University’s Farmer School of Business, an experiential, cohort-based program integrating four interdisciplinary courses. The FYIC emphasizes collaboration, creative problem-solving, and a culminating “client challenge” project to help students navigate real-world complexity. Through gamified learning and the principles of Collective Genius (creative abrasion, agility, and resolution), the program develops team-based innovation and prepares Gen Z students for workplace readiness.
Downloads
References
Ahn, J. N., Hu, D., & Vega, M. (2020). “Do as I do, not as I say”: Using social learning theory to unpack the impact of role models on students' outcomes in education. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(2), e12517.
Alexander, C. (2012). A study of the Cognitive Determinants of Generation Y’s Entitlement Mentality. Academy of Educational Leadership, 16(2), 63–68.
Argyris, C., and D. A. Schön. 1978. Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California, USA.
Argyris, C., and D. A. Schön. 1996. Organizational learning II: theory, method and practice. Addison Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, USA.
Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy‐enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students' engagement in schoolwork. British journal of educational psychology, 72(2), 261-278.
Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on psychological science, 1(2), 164-180.
Bielaczyc, Kate & Collins, A.. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory.
Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). Assessment for experiential learning (p. 379). Taylor & Francis.
Cickovska, E. (2020). Understanding and teaching Gen Z in higher education. Horizons-International Scientific Journal, 26(3), 275-290.
Cilliers, E. J. (2021, January). Reflecting on social learning tools to enhance the teaching-learning experience of generation Z learners. In Frontiers in education (Vol. 5, p. 606533). Frontiers Media SA.
Coleman, B., Beasy, K., Morrison, R., & Mainsbridge, C. (2024). Academics’ perspectives on a student engagement and retention program: dilemmas and deficit discourses. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(2), 518-535.
Daniel, S. J. (2020). Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospects, 49(1), 91-96.
DeCharms, R. (1976). Enhancing motivation: Change in the classroom. New York: Irvington.
Einstein, A. (2023). Teaching students how to learn. Educational Utopias, 227.
Ernst & Young Report. (2016). From Innovation to Expectation – How M & E Leaders are Responding to Gen Z. Retrieved April 28, 2017, from http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/ey-mediaentertainmentleaders-respond-to gen-z/$FILE/ey-media-entertain
Ervianti, E., Sampelolo, R., & Pratama, M. P. (2023). The Influence of Digital Literacy on Student Learning. Klasikal: Journal of Education, Language Teaching and Science, 5(2), 358-365.
Gablenick, F., MacGregor, J., Matthews, R., & Smith, B.L. (1990). Learning communities: Creating connections among students, faculty, and disciplines. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 41 (Spring). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc..
Gerhardt, M., Nachemson-Ekwall, J., & Fogel, B. (2021). Gentelligence: The revolutionary approach to leading an intergenerational workforce. Rowman & Littlefield.
Guaman-Quintanilla, S., Everaert, P., Chiluiza, K., & Valcke, M. (2023). Impact of design thinking in higher education: a multi-actor perspective on problem solving and creativity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(1), 217-240.
Hernandez-de-Menendez, M., Escobar Díaz, C. A., & Morales-Menendez, R. (2020). Educational experiences with Generation Z. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 14(3), 847-859.
Horlenko, K., & Kaminskiene, L. (2022, May). Systematic literature review on agentic engagement: Clarifying a co-creation perspective. In SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 382-393).
Katz, R., Ogilvie, S., Shaw, J., & Woodhead, L. (2022). Gen Z, explained: The art of living in a digital age. University of Chicago Press.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Koutroubas, V., & Galanakis, M. (2022). Bandura’s Social Learning Theory and Its Importance in the Organizational Psychology Context. Psychology, 12(6), 315-322.
Kumar, S., & Bhandarker, A. (2017). Experiential Learning and Its Relevance in Business School Curriculum. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 44, 244–251.
Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Li, J., & Xue, E. (2023). Dynamic interaction between student learning behaviour and learning environment: Meta-analysis of student engagement and its influencing factors. Behavioral Sciences, 13(1), 59.
Mahesh, J., Bhat, A. K., & Suresh, R. (2021). Are Gen Z values the new disruptor for future educational institutions?. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 21(12).
Morris, T. H. (2020). Experiential learning–a systematic review and revision of Kolb’s model. Interactive learning environments, 28(8), 1064-1077.
Muro, M., and P. Jeffrey. 2008. A critical review of the theory and application of social learning in participatory natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 51:325-344.
Nicholas, A. J. (2020). Preferred learning methods of generation Z. Faculty and Staff - Articles & Papers. 74. https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/fac_staff_pub/74
Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (Eds.). (2005). Educating the Net Gen. Washington, D.C.: EDUCAUSE.*
Patel, C. J., Gali, V. S., Patel, D. V., and Parmar, R. D. (2011). The effects of information and communication technologies (ICTs) on higher education: from objectivism to social constructivism. Int. J. Vocation. Tech. Educ. 3, 113–120. Available online at: https://africaneditors.org/journal/IJVTE/abstract/69579-118992
Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher education for the future, 8(1), 133-141.
Pueschel, A., Johnson, R. C., & Dhanani, L. Y. (2020). Putting Gen Z first: Educating with a generational mind-set. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 13(4), 594-598.
Reed, M. S., A. C. Evely, G. Cundill, I. Fazey, J. Glass, A. Laing, J. Newig, B. Parrish, C. Prell, C. Raymond, C. & Stringer, L. C. (2010). What is social learning? Ecology and Society XX(YY): rZZ. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/volXX/issYY/artZZ/
Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of educational psychology, 105(3), 579.
Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H. (2021). Autonomy-supportive teaching: Its malleability, benefits, and potential to improve educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 56(1), 54-77.
Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2022). Agentic engagement. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 95-107). Springer, Cham.
Reeve, J., Jang, H. R., Shin, S. H., Ahn, J. S., Matos, L., & Gargurevich, R. (2022). When students show some initiative: Two experiments on the benefits of greater agentic engagement. Learning and Instruction, 80, 101564.
Schroth, H. (2019). Are you ready for Gen Z in the workplace? California Management Review, 61(3), 5–18. doi: 10.1177/ 0008125619841006
Schwieger, D., & Ladwig, C. (2018). Reaching and retaining the next generation: Adapting to the expectations of Gen Z in the classroom. Information Systems Education Journal, 16(3), 45.
Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2016). Generation Z goes to college. Jossey-Bass.
Senge, P. M. 1990. The leader’s New Work: building learning organizations. Sloan Management Review 7-23.
Shet, S. V. (2024). A VUCA-ready workforce: exploring employee competencies and learning and development implications. Personnel Review, 53(3), 674-703.
Spohn, S. (2017). Millennials & Gen Z In The Workplace. Greater Lansing Business Monthly. Lansing, 30(6), 16–17.
Stern, R. (2014). Generation Z, Teachers, How's Today's “Creative Classroom” Working for You? Available online at:http://www.chicagonow.com/gifted-matters/2014/05/generation-z-teachers-hows-todays-creative-classroom-working-for-you (accessed March 20, 2017).
Stillman, D., & Stillman, J. (2017). Gen Z @ Work: How the Next Generation Is Transforming the Workplace. HarperBusiness.
Stodolsky, S. S., & Grossman, P. L. (2000). Changing Students, Changing Teaching1. Teachers College Record, 102(1), 125-172.
Tharapos, M., Peszynski, K., Lau, K. H., Heffernan, M., Vesty, G., & Ghalebeigi, A. (2023). Effective teaching, student engagement and student satisfaction during the Covid‐19 pandemic: Evidence from business students' qualitative survey evaluations. Accounting & Finance, 63(3), 3173-3192.
Tinto, Vincent. (2000). Learning Better Together: The Impact of Learning Communities on Student Success. Journal of Institutional Research. 9.
Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA.
Wenger-Trayner, E., Wenger, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2020). Learning to make a difference: Value creation in social learning spaces. Cambridge university press.
Werner, K., & Woessmann, L. (2023). The legacy of COVID-19 in education. Economic Policy, 38(115), 609-668.
Downloads
Published
License
Access Agreement Journal on Excellence in College Teaching
Before proceeding you must agree to the terms and conditions of usage as outlined below by clicking on the Accept button and/or by both parties’ signatures below. You will have to do this only once. After agreement, you will be redirected back to the main Journal page. A pdf copy of the terms is available for download.
This Access Agreement (the "Agreement") is effective upon processing of payment ("Effective Date") and is entered into by and between the Journal on Excellence in College Teaching (“JECT”) and the Customer (“Customer").
This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and supersedes and voids all prior communications, understandings, and agreements relating to the Product(s), including any terms of use displayed to Authorized Users via the online site of the Product(s). Alterations to the Agreement and to any Addendum to the Agreement are only valid and binding if they are recorded in writing and signed by both parties
. I. Definitions
"Authorized Users" shall mean individuals who are authorized by the Customer (which shall include those individuals authorized by the Institutions hereunder) to access the Customer's information services whether on-site or off-site via secure authentication and who are affiliated with the Customer as a student (undergraduates and postgraduates), employee (whether on a permanent or temporary basis), or a contractor of the Customer. Individuals who are not a current student, employee, or a contractor of the Customer, but who are permitted to access the Customer's information services from computer terminals within the physical premises of the Customer ("Walk-In Users"), are also deemed to be Authorized Users, but only for the time they are within the physical premises of the Customer. Walk-In Users may not be given means to access the Product(s) when they are not within the physical premises of the Customer.
"Commercial Use" shall mean use for the purpose of monetary reward (whether by or for the Customer or an Authorized User) by means of the sale, resale, loan, transfer, hire, or other form of exploitation of the Product(s). For the avoidance of doubt, neither recovery of direct cost by the Customer from Authorized Users, nor use by the Customer or Authorized Users of the Product(s) in the course of research funded by a commercial organization, shall be deemed to constitute Commercial Use.
"Educational Purposes" shall mean for the purpose of education, teaching, distance learning, private study and/or research as described in Section II below.
"Institutions" shall mean the Customer's participating institutions, if applicable.
"License" shall mean the non-exclusive, non-transferable right to access and use the Product(s) pursuant to the specific terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.
"Product(s)" shall mean the products, materials and/or information contained therein that are subject to this Agreement. Product(s) include the Journal on Excellence in College Teaching and the archive of the Learning Communities Journal.
"Reasonable Amount" shall be determined based on guidelines set forth by 17 U.S. Code § 107 (Limitations on exclusive rights, Fair use).
"Secure Authentication" shall mean access to the Product(s) by Internet Protocol ("IP") ranges or by another means of authentication agreed between the Publisher and Customer or Institutions (if applicable) from time to time.
II. Authorized Use of Product(s)
Customer, the Institutions (if applicable), and Authorized Users may use the Product(s) for Educational Purposes as follows:
Analysis. Authorized Users shall be permitted to extract or use information contained in the Product(s) for Educational Purposes, including, but not limited to, text and data mining, extraction and manipulation of information for the purposes of illustration, explanation, example, comment, criticism, teaching, research, or analysis.
Course Packs. Customer, the Institutions, and Authorized Users may use a Reasonable Amount of the Product(s) in the preparation of course packs or other educational materials.
Digital Copy. Customer, the Institutions, and Authorized Users may download and digitally copy a Reasonable Amount of the Product(s).
Display. Customer, the Institutions, and Authorized Users shall have the right to electronically display the Product(s) to the extent necessary to further the intent and purpose of this Agreement.
Electronic Reserve. Customer, the Institutions, and Authorized Users may use a Reasonable Amount of each of the Product(s) in connection with specific courses of instruction offered by Customer.
Interlibrary Loan. The Customer and the Institutions shall be permitted to use Reasonable Amounts of the Content to fulfill occasional requests from other, non-participating institutions, a practice commonly called Interlibrary Loan ("ILL"). Customer and the Institutions shall fulfill such requests in compliance with Section 108 of the United States Copyright Law (17 USC S108, "Limitations on exclusive rights: Reproduction by libraries and archives") and the Guidelines for the Proviso of Subsection 108(2g)(2) prepared by the National Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted Works (CONTU).
The electronic form of the Product(s) may be used as a source for ILL. Customer and the Institutions shall include copyright notices on all ILL transmissions. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in no event shall any non-secure electronic transmission of files be permitted.
Print Copy. Customer, the Institutions, and Authorized Users may print a Reasonable Amount of the Product(s).
Recover Copying Costs. Customer and the Institutions may charge a reasonable fee to cover costs of copying or printing portions of Product(s) for Authorized Users.
Scholarly Sharing. Authorized Users may transmit to a third party colleague in hard copy or electronically, Reasonable Amounts of the Product(s) for personal use, professional use, or Educational Purposes but in no event for Commercial Use. In addition, Authorized Users have the right to use, with appropriate credit, figures, tables, and brief excerpts from the Product(s) in the Authorized User's own scientific, scholarly, and educational works.
Text Mining. Authorized Users may use the licensed material to perform and engage in text mining/data mining activities for legitimate academic research and other Educational Purposes. Those uses beyond educational use shall require permission from the Publisher.
III. Restrictions
Except as provided herein, the institution shall make reasonable efforts to inform its authorized users not to use, alter, decompile, modify, display, or distribute the Product(s) as follows:
Alter Identification. Remove, obscure, or modify copyright notices, text acknowledging, attributions, or other means of identification or disclaimers as they appear. Alter Product(s).
Alter, decompile, adapt, or modify the Product(s), except to the extent necessary to make it perceptible on a computer screen, or as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Alteration of words or their order is strictly prohibited.
Commercial Use. No Commercial Use of the Product(s) shall be permitted unless the Customer or an Authorized User has been granted prior written consent by an authorized representative of the Product(s). Use of all or any part of the Product(s) for any Commercial Use or for any purpose other than Educational Purposes.
Distribution. Display or distribute any part of the Product(s) on any electronic network, including without limitation, the Internet, and any other distribution medium now in existence or hereinafter created, other than by a Secure Authentication; print and distribute any portion(s) of the Product(s)s to persons or entities other than the Customer or Authorized Users, except as provided in Section II.
JECT acknowledges that the Customer cannot police or control the actions of its students, faculty, and other Authorized Users with respect to their use of the Product(s). In the event of abuse, the institution shall make prompt and reasonable efforts to heal the breach and notify the publisher.
IV. Term and Termination
This agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall remain in effect unless and until terminated as permitted herein (the "Term"). There is no perpetual electronic access to content made available during the term of the agreement.
JECT may terminate this Agreement if Customer violates any of the terms and conditions set forth herein. In the event of any termination of access, JECT will promptly notify the Customer of the basis for termination.
The Customer may terminate this Agreement if sufficient funds are not provided or allotted in future government-approved budgets of the Customer (or reasonably available or expected to become available from other sources at the time the Customer’s payment obligation attaches) to permit the Subscriber, in the exercise of its reasonable administrative discretion, to continue this Agreement.
In the event of any unauthorized use of the Product(s) by an Authorized User, Customer shall cooperate with JECT in the investigation of any unauthorized use of the Product(s) of which it is made aware and shall use reasonable efforts to remedy such unauthorized use and prevent its recurrence. JECT may terminate such Authorized User's access to the Product(s) after first providing reasonable notice to the Customer (in no event less than two (2) weeks) and cooperating with the Customer to avoid recurrence of any unauthorized use. In the event of any termination of access, JECT will promptly notify the Customer
. V. Refunds
In the event that a subscription is canceled by the Customer prior to the subscription end date, the following will be used as guidelines for refunds.
Electronic subscriptions. The Customer shall be entitled to a full refund within 14 days of the start of the most recent subscription term. Refunds requested after 14 days but no later than 60 days from the start of the most recent subscription term will be allowed, minus a 30% processing fee. Refunds will not be granted if requested more than 60 days after the start of the most recent subscription term.
