Benefits and Challenges of Developing and Teaching Popular Culture-Themed Courses

Authors

Keywords:

themed courses, faculty engagement, popular culture

Abstract

This study examined the use of popular culture-themed (PCT) courses in higher education. The goal was to define PCT courses operationally as well as qualitatively to explore benefits and challenges associated with teaching these courses. Instructors from a wide range of disciplines who have taught or are currently teaching a PCT course were asked about their experiences. A thematic analysis revealed seven benefits (for instance, they are fun) and seven challenges (for instance, it is difficult to find materials) to guide instructors in developing PCT courses. Strategies to mitigate these challenges are also discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Jill M. Swirsky, Holy Family University

    Jill M. Swirsky is currently an Assistant Professor of Psychology at Holy Family University. Her research interests include peer relationships and social dynamics among early adolescents (e.g., aggression, victimization, and popularity) as well as the role of social media behaviors in adolescent development and adjustment. She is also interested creative ways to foster student engagement in higher education.

  • Susan Geffen, Occidental College

    Susan Geffen is currently an NTT Assistant Professor of Psychology at Occidental College. Her research interests include the scholarship of teaching and learning, and how babies, children and adults develop language and cognitive skills.

  • Kathy R. Doody, SUNY, Buffalo State University

    Dr. Kathy Doody is  Professor at SUNY, Buffalo State’s Exceptional Education program and teaches early childhood courses. Other areas of interest include ASD, behavior management, educational collaboration, and low-incidence disabilities. She is also a certified special education teacher, and worked for 14 years with infants/preschoolers on the autism spectrum.

  • Pamela Schuetze, SUNY, Buffalo State University

    Dr. Pamela Schuetze is a Professor of Psychology at SUNY, Buffalo State where she also coordinates the Child Advocacy Studies program. Her research focuses on autonomic indices of regulatory processes in high-risk infants, children and adolescents. She also regularly conducts research on the scholarship of teaching and learning.

  • Emily F. Coyle, WestEd, San Francisco, CA

    Dr. Emily F. Coyle is an Associate Professor of Psychology at Saint Martin's University in Lacey, WA, with affiliations in Women's, Gender, and Ethnic Studies and in Leadership Studies. Her research interests are in social cognitive development and its impact on aspiration and achievement, particularly in the context of informal settings (e.g., play) and for girls in STEM domains. She is broadly interested in gender role and stereotype development across the lifespan, including individual differences in attention to and schematic processing of gender-related cues.

  • Lisa Timmons, University of Texas at Dallas

    Lisa Timmons is an Assistant Professor of Child Development at California State University, Stanislaus. Her research interests include early parent-child interactions, early predictors of emotion regulation development, family dynamics especially in families of children with autism spectrum disorder, and practices for effective teaching of developmental psychology. 

  • Erica Weisgram, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point

    Dr. Erica Weisgram is a Professor of Psychology at University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point. Her research interests broadly include gender development including gender and toys, girls and women in STEM, and the construction of gender stereotypes. 

References

Blessing, S. B., & Blessing, J. S. (2015). Using a movie as a capstone activity for the introductory course. Teaching of Psychology, 42(1), 51–55.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628314562678

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brundiers, K., Wiek, A., & Redman, C. L. (2010). Real‐world learning opportunities in sustainability: From classroom into the real world. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education.

Cutri, R., Marim, L. R., Cordeiro, J. R., Gil, H. A., & Guerald, C. C. T. (2016, June). Kahoot, a new and cheap way to get classroom-response instead of using clickers. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.

Dailey, H. (2023, August 15). Taylor Swift, Harry Styles, Beyoncé & more: 10 pop stars with college courses dedicated to them. Retrieved from https://www.billboard.com/lists/college-music-classes-taylor-swift-pop/lana-del-rey/

DeFelippo, A.M., & Dee, J.R. (2022). Vitality in the academic workplace: Sustaining professional growth for mid-career faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 47(4), 565–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09589-z

Dietrich, N., Jimenez, M., Souto, M., Harrison, A. W., Coudret, C., & Olmos, É. (2021). Using pop-culture to engage students in the classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(3), 896–906.

Geffen, S., Swirsky, J.M., Coyle, E., Doody, K.R., Schuetz, P., Timmons, L., & Weisgram, E. (2022). “Can you tell me how to get” started: Using Sesame Street as an example for developing a themed course? Professors @ Play Playbook: Playful teaching techniques in higher education. In L. Forbes & D. Thomas (editors). Carnegie Mellon University ETC Press.

Harrill, M., Lawton, J. A., & Fablanke, J. C. (2015). Faculty and staff engagement: A core component of student success. Peer Review, 17(4), 11-15.

Haupt, A. (2024, April 19). Why Taylor Swift’s music makes us so emotional. Time.

https://time.com/6968864/why-music-makes-us-emotional-taylor-swift/

Hymers, D., & Newton, G. (2019). Investigating student engagement in first-year biology education: A comparison of major and non-major perception of engagement across different active learning activities. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(1), n1.

Kahu, E., Nelson, K., & Picton, C. (2017). Student interest as a key driver of engagement for first year students. Student Success, 8(2), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v8i2.379

Kath, L. M., Schmidt, G. B., Islam, S., Jimenez, W. P., & Hartnett, J. L. (2022). Getting psyched about memes in the psychology classroom. Teaching of Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283221085908

Langley, T. (March 10, 2018). Why popular culture psychology? The power of story. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/beyond-heroes-and-villains/201803/why-popular-culture-psychology-the-power-story

Lammers, W. J., Gillaspy Jr, J. A., & Hancock, F. (2017). Predicting academic success with early, middle, and late semester assessment of student–instructor rapport. Teaching of Psychology, 44(2), 145–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628317692618

Mangan, K. (2014). ‘Fear and horror’- themed courses help keep Texas system’s students engaged. The Chronicle of Higher Education Newsletter, March 2014. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/FearHorror-Themed/145093/?cid=cc&utm_source=cc&utm_medium=en

Matherly, C. (2024). For some professors, Taylor Swift is a student-engagement tactic. The Chronicle of Higher Education Newsletter, January 2024. Retrieved from https://www-chronicle-com.oxy.idm.oclc.org/article/for-some-professors-taylor-swift-is-a-student-engagement-tactic

Middlestadt, S. E., Bhattacharyya, K., Rosenbaum, J., Fishbein, M., & Shepherd, M. (1996). The use of theory based semi structured elicitation questionnaires: formative research for CDC's Prevention Marketing Initiative. Public Health Reports, 111, 18.

Pappas, C. C., Levstik, L. S., & Kiefer, B. Z. (1999). An integrated language perspective in the elementary school: An action approach. Third edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Pressley, T. (2021). Factors contributing to teacher burnout during COVID-19. Educational Researcher, 50(5), 325–327. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211004138

Price, D.V., & Tovar, E. (2014). Student engagement and institutional graduation rates: Identifying high-impact educational practices for community colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 38(9), 766–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2012.719481

Pryor, G. S. (2008). Using pop culture to teach introductory biology. The American Biology Teacher, 70(7), 396-399. https://doi.org/10.1662/0002-7685(2008)70[396:UPCTTI]2.0.CO;2

Richmond, A. S., Berglund, M. B., Epelbaum, V. B., & Klein, E. M. (2015). a+(b1) Professor-student rapport+(b2) humor+(b3) student engagement=(Ŷ) Student ratings of instructors. Teaching of Psychology, 42(2), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315569924

Riordan, M. A., Abo-Zebiba, Z., & Marsh, J. (2022). A comparison of multimedia and traditional paper assignments in an introductory psychology course. Teaching of Psychology, 49(2), 130–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320954192

Shen B., McCaughtry N., Martin J., Garn A., Kulik N., Fahlman M. (2015). The relationship between teacher burnout and student motivation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12089

Tews, M. J., Jackson, K., Ramsay, C., & Michel, J. W. (2015). Fun in the college classroom: Examining its nature and relationship with student engagement. College Teaching, 63(1), 16–26.

Published

2025-04-30

Data Availability Statement

The datasets analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the senior author on reasonable request.

How to Cite

Benefits and Challenges of Developing and Teaching Popular Culture-Themed Courses. (2025). Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 36(2). https://celt.miamioh.edu/index.php/JECT/article/view/1189