Exploring Student and Faculty Experiences in a HyFlex Learning Environment

Authors

  • Kim Buch University of North Carolina Charlotte Author
  • Jules Keith-Le University of North Carolina Charlotte Author

Keywords:

hybrid, hyflex, learning environments, student success

Abstract

Almost five years after the COVID-19 pandemic began, the higher education learning environment has been transformed, and research on this transformation is just starting to emerge. This article contributes to this effort by reporting the results of a study comparing two-course delivery formats: hybrid in-person and HyFlex. Results found no significant differences in student performance, attendance, or course ratings across formats. Results also revealed that students rate the HyFlex format favorably compared to other delivery formats. The authors examine the lessons learned and their implications for designing learning environments that are engaging, effective, and accessible.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Kim Buch, University of North Carolina Charlotte

    Kim Buch is an Organizational Psychologist and Professor of Psychological Science at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte.  She also serves as a Faculty Fellow in the Center for Teaching and Learning.  

  • Jules Keith-Le, University of North Carolina Charlotte

    Dr. Jules Keith-Le works for the University of North Carolina at Charlotte with the College of Education and the Office of OneIT. Their research focuses on dynamic learning environments and active learning practices.

References

Amirova, A., Zhumabayeva, A., Zhunusbekova, A., Kalbergenova, S., Nygymanova, N., & Arenova, A. (2023). Effect of using HyFlex technology learning on preservice teachers’ success and attitudes. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology, 11(3), 623-642. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3309

Bockorny, K. M., Giannavola, T. M., Mathew, S., & Walters, H. D., (2023). Effective management strategies in HyFlex modality based on intrinsic motivation in students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 0, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874231161364

Burnside, E., O’Connell, N., & Tillman, A., (2023, June 22 - 25). Flexible conversations: One writing program’s experience implementing flipped, hybrid, first-year writing courses [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the Computers & Writing Annual Conference, Davis, CA, United States. https://doi.org/10.37514/PCW-B.2024.2296.2.03

Calafiore, P., & Giudici, E., (2021). Hybrid versus hyflex instruction in an introductory finance course. International Journal of Education Research, 16(1), 40+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A681582940/AONE?u=char69915&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=fa592dcf

Davie, J. (2022). Evaluation of the hyflex, hybrid, and asynchronous online teaching modalities on student learning in graduate microbiology coursework. The FASEB Journal, 36(S1). https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.S1.R6050

Detyna, M., Sanchez-Pizani, R., Giampietro, V., Dommett. E., & Dyer, K., (2023). Hybrid flexible (HyFlex) teaching and learning: Climbing the mountain of implementation challenges for synchronous online and face-to-face seminars during a pandemic. Learning Environments Research, 26(1), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09408-y

Guidry, K., (2022). Hyflex courses: A flex or a flop? Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 27, 1-9.

Helms, J. (2014). Comparing student performance in online and face-to-face delivery modalities. Journal of asynchronous learning networks, 18(1), 147-160.

Hodge, E., Tucker, S., & Williams, S. (2004). Teaching and learning: Student perceptions of course delivery methods. New Horizons in Adult Education, 18(1), 5-15. https://doi.org/10/1002/nha3.10175

Karnik, A., Kishore, P., & Mohammad, M. (2020). Examining the linkage between class attendance at university and academic performance in an International Branch Campus setting. Research in Comparative and International Education, 15, 1-20.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499920958855

Khan, S., Battestilli, L., Bohorquez, E., & Fogelman, A. (2023). Hybrid flexible (HyFlex) instruction in nutrition education: What, how, why, and when to use? Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 55(7), 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neb.2023.05.210

Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L., (2021). Adopting HyFlex in higher education in response to COVID-19: Students’ perspectives. Open Learning the Journal of Open, Distance, and e-Learning, 36(3), 231-244. https://doi.org/10.1080.02680513.2021.1906641

Kyei-Blankson, L., & Ntuli, E. (2013). Hybrid Courses with Flexible Participation: The HyFlex Course Design. In Practical Applications and Experiences in K-20 Blended Learning Environments (pp. 153–177). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4912-5.ch011

Lakhal, S., Khechine, H., & Pascot, D. (2014, October 27). Academic students’ satisfaction and learning outcomes in a HyFlex course: Do delivery modes matter? [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning, New Orleans, LA, United States.

Lieberman, M. (2018, January 23). Introducing a new(-ish) learning mode: Blendflex/HyFlex. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2018/01/24/blendflex-lets-students-toggle-between-online-or-face-face

Ly, V. (2022). Application of hy-flex teaching based on digital technology. Frontiers in Educational Research, 5(12), 96-106. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.2022.051218

Miller, J., Risser, M., & Griffiths, R. (2013). Student choice, instructor flexibility: Moving beyond the blended instructional model. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_itet_v1i1_16464

Milman, N. B. (2023). Teaching using the hyflex approach. Distance Learning, 20(1), 53-55.

Paykamian, B. (2022). Universities expand HyFlex learning to meet student demands. Government Technology.

Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., & Depaepe. F. (2020). A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: Gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, 23(3), 269-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z

Rhoads, D. D. (2020). Traditional, online or both? A comparative study of university student learning and satisfaction between traditional and hyflex delivery modalities (Publication No. 27995688) [Doctoral dissertation, Concordia University Irvine]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.

Verrecchia, P., & McGlinchey, M. J. (2021). Teaching during COVID: The effectiveness of the HyFlex classroom in a 300 level statistics class. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 9(3), 23-. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v9i3.5146

Weathers, J., & McNeely, C. (2021). 489 success of hyflex teaching modality in animal reproduction. Journal of Animal Science, 99(Supplement_3), 216–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab235.394

Published

2025-07-03

Data Availability Statement

No, the research data have not been made available.

How to Cite

Exploring Student and Faculty Experiences in a HyFlex Learning Environment. (2025). Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 36(3). https://celt.miamioh.edu/index.php/JECT/article/view/1188