Building Connections With First-Year Students Through Peer Mentorship and Teachable Moments
Keywords:
First-year Experience, mentoring, mentees, mentors, professional development, connection, relationship, postsecondary outcomes, transitionsAbstract
To build connections among students studying education, the researchers implemented a First-Year Experiences (FYE) peer mentorship program with embedded professional development workshops called Teachable Moments for first-year students. This innovative approach to meeting the needs of first-year students was measured through a mixed-methods project using an open-ended survey and the coding of qualitative data from communication logs. Data revealed that the programmatic and curricular guidance and support provided to the first-year students led to the establishment of vital connections and positively impacted retention from their first to their second year.
Downloads
References
Bean, J. P. (1980). Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and test of a causal model of student attrition. Research in Higher Education, 12, 155–187. doi:10.1007/BF00976194
Berger, J. B., & Milem, J. F. (1999). The role of student involvement and perceptions of integration in a causal model of student persistence. Research in Higher Education, 40(6), 641–664. doi:10.1023/A:1018708813711
Bohannon, R. L., & Bohannon, S. M. (2015). Mentoring: A decade of effort and personal impact. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 81(2), 31–36.
Braxton, J. M., Milem, J. F., & Sullivan, A. S. (2004). The influence of active learning on the college student departure process: Toward a revision of Tinto’s theory. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(5), 569–590.
Burke, P.J. (1991). Attitudes, behavior, and the self. In Howard, J. A. and Callero, P. L. (Eds.). The Self Society Interface: Cognition, emotion, and action. (pp. 189-208). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527722.011
Chapman, D. W., & Pascarella, E. T. (1983). Validation of a theoretical model of college withdrawal: Interaction effects in a multi-institutional sample. Research in Higher Education, 19(1), 25–48. doi:10.1007/BF00977337
Cleaver, J. (2016). How to mentor. TCE: The Chemical Engineer, 896, 44–50.
Collier, P.J. (2017). Why peer mentoring is an effective approach for promoting college student success. Metropolitan Universities, 28(3), 9-19. doi: 10.18060/21539
Collier, P. J. & Morgan, D. (2008). Is that paper really due today? Differences in first generation and traditional college students' understandings of faculty members' class-related expectations. Higher Education, 55(4), 425-446.
Crisp, G., & Cruz, I. (2009). Mentoring college students: A critical review of the literature between 1990 and 2007. Research in Higher Education, 50(6), 525–545.
DeMarinis, M., Beaulieu, J., Cull, I., & Abd-El-Aziz, A. (2017). A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding the Impact of a First-Year Peer Mentor Program. Journal of The First Year Experience & Students in Transition, 29(2), 93-107.
Dubois, A., & Gadde, L. E. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55, 553–560.
Felton, P., & Lambert, L.M. (2020). Relationship-rich education. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Flores, G., & Estudillo, A. G. (2018) Effects of a peer-to-peer mentoring program: Supporting first-year college students’ academic and social integration on campus. Journal of Human Services: Training, Research, and Practice: 3(2).
Gershenfeld, S. A. (2014). Review of undergraduate mentoring programs. Review of Educational Research, 84, 365-391. doi:10.3102/0034654313520512.
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 15–31.
Glaser, N., Hall, R., & Halperin, S. (2006). Students supporting students: The effects of peer mentoring on the experiences of first-year university students. Journal of the Australia and New Zealand Student Services Association, 27, 4–17.
Grant-Vallone, E. J., & Ensher, E. A. (2000). Effects of peer mentoring on types of mentor support, program satisfaction and graduate student stress: A dyadic perspective. Journal of College Student Development, 41(6), 637–642.
Hall, H. R. (2015). Food for thought: Using critical pedagogy in mentoring African American adolescent males. Black Scholar, 45(3), 39–53. doi:10.1080/ 00064246.2015.1049328
Henriksen, R.C., Jr., Marks, D.F., Smith, J.D. (2016). Training mentors for faith-based mentoring. VISTAS Online, 62, 1-17.
Hughes, A. & Fahy, R. (2009). Implementing an undergraduate psychology mentoring. North American Journal of Psychology, 11. 463-470.
Inzlicht, M., Good, C., Levin, S., & van Laar, C. (2006). How environments can threaten academic performance, self-knowledge, and sense of belonging. Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspectives, 129–150.
Irby, B. J. (2014). Editor's overview: A 20-year content review of research on the topic of development. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnerships in Learning, 22(3), 181-189.
Jacobi, MM (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 505–532. ISSN 00346543. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1170575.
Karp, M. M., O’Gara, L., & Hughes, K. L. (2008). Do support services at community colleges encourage success or reproduce disadvantage? An exploratory study in two community colleges (CCRC Working Paper No. 10). New York: Columbia University, Teachers College, Community College Research Center.
Kemmery, M.A., & Compton, M.V. (2014). Are you deaf or hard of hearing? Which do you go by: Perceptions of identity in families of students with hearing loss. The Volta Review, 114 (2), 157–192.
Klinge, C. M. (2015). A conceptual framework for mentoring in a learning organization. Adult Learning, 26(4), 160–166. doi:10.1177/1045159515594154
Krusemark, S., & White, G. (2020). Relationships drive success: How peer mentoring empowers students. Association of American Colleges & Universities: A Voice and a Force for Liberal Education, 106, 1-2.
Leidenfrost, B., Strassnig, B., Schabmann, A., Spiel, C., & Carbon, C. (2011). Peer mentoring styles and their contribution to academic success among mentees: A person oriented study in higher education. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partners in Learning, 19(3), 347–364. doi:10.1080/13611267.2011.597122
Litwin, M.S. (1995) How to measure survey reliability and validity. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348957
Mallinckrodt, B. (1988). Student retention, social support, and dropout intention: Comparison of Black and White students. Journal of College Student Development, 29(1), 60–64.
Mantle-Bromley, C., Foster, A. M., Wilson, C. A., Kozleski, E., & Anderson-Parsons, B.
(2000). Educational leaders’ visions for and roles in simultaneous educational renewal. International Journal: Continuous Improvement Monitor, 2(1), Edinburg, TX: The University of Texas-Pan American.
“Measuring College and University Outcomes,” Gallup, accessed March 24,
, https://www.gallup.com/education/194264/strada-gallup-alumni-survey.aspx.
Miller, J., Barnes, J., Miller, H., & McKinnon, L. (2013). Exploring the link between mentoring program structure & success rates: Results from a national survey. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(3), 439–456.
Nora, A., Cabrera, A., Hagedorn, L. S., & Pascarella, E. (1996). Differential impacts of academic and social experiences on college-related behavioral outcomes across different ethnic and gender groups and four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 37(4), 427–451.
Palmer, R.J., Hunt, A.N., Neal, M., & Wuetherick, B. (2015). Mentoring, undergraduate research, and identity development: A conceptual review and research agenda. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 23(5), 411-426.
Rodger, S., & Tremblay, P. F. (2003). The effects of a peer mentoring program on academic success among first-year university students. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 33(3), 1–18.
Salinitri, G. (2005). The effects of formal mentoring on the retention rates for first-year, low achieving students. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue Canadienne de l’éducation, 28(4), 853–873. https://doi.org/10.2307/4126458
Stout, J. G., Ito, T. A., Finkelstein, N. D., & Pollock, S. J. (2013). How a gender gap in belonging contributes to the gender gap in physics participation. In AIP Conference Proceedings, volume 1513, pages 402–405. Institute of Physics Publishing, Philadelphia, PA.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In W.G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relation (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tinto, V. (1997). Classrooms as communities: Exploring the educational character of student persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 68(6), 599–623.
Ward, E. G., Thomas, E. E., & Disch, W. B. (2010). Goal attainment, retention and peer mentoring. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 14(2), 170–176.
Yomtov, D., Plunkett, S. W., Efrat, R., & Garcia Marin, A. (2017). Can peer mentors improve first-year experiences of university students? Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, & Practice 19(1), 25-44.
Zaniewski, A.M., Reinholz, D. Increasing STEM success: a near-peer mentoring program in the physical sciences. IJ STEM Ed 3, 14 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0043-2
Downloads
Published
License
Access Agreement Journal on Excellence in College Teaching
Before proceeding you must agree to the terms and conditions of usage as outlined below by clicking on the Accept button and/or by both parties’ signatures below. You will have to do this only once. After agreement, you will be redirected back to the main Journal page. A pdf copy of the terms is available for download.
This Access Agreement (the "Agreement") is effective upon processing of payment ("Effective Date") and is entered into by and between the Journal on Excellence in College Teaching (“JECT”) and the Customer (“Customer").
This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and supersedes and voids all prior communications, understandings, and agreements relating to the Product(s), including any terms of use displayed to Authorized Users via the online site of the Product(s). Alterations to the Agreement and to any Addendum to the Agreement are only valid and binding if they are recorded in writing and signed by both parties
. I. Definitions
"Authorized Users" shall mean individuals who are authorized by the Customer (which shall include those individuals authorized by the Institutions hereunder) to access the Customer's information services whether on-site or off-site via secure authentication and who are affiliated with the Customer as a student (undergraduates and postgraduates), employee (whether on a permanent or temporary basis), or a contractor of the Customer. Individuals who are not a current student, employee, or a contractor of the Customer, but who are permitted to access the Customer's information services from computer terminals within the physical premises of the Customer ("Walk-In Users"), are also deemed to be Authorized Users, but only for the time they are within the physical premises of the Customer. Walk-In Users may not be given means to access the Product(s) when they are not within the physical premises of the Customer.
"Commercial Use" shall mean use for the purpose of monetary reward (whether by or for the Customer or an Authorized User) by means of the sale, resale, loan, transfer, hire, or other form of exploitation of the Product(s). For the avoidance of doubt, neither recovery of direct cost by the Customer from Authorized Users, nor use by the Customer or Authorized Users of the Product(s) in the course of research funded by a commercial organization, shall be deemed to constitute Commercial Use.
"Educational Purposes" shall mean for the purpose of education, teaching, distance learning, private study and/or research as described in Section II below.
"Institutions" shall mean the Customer's participating institutions, if applicable.
"License" shall mean the non-exclusive, non-transferable right to access and use the Product(s) pursuant to the specific terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.
"Product(s)" shall mean the products, materials and/or information contained therein that are subject to this Agreement. Product(s) include the Journal on Excellence in College Teaching and the archive of the Learning Communities Journal.
"Reasonable Amount" shall be determined based on guidelines set forth by 17 U.S. Code § 107 (Limitations on exclusive rights, Fair use).
"Secure Authentication" shall mean access to the Product(s) by Internet Protocol ("IP") ranges or by another means of authentication agreed between the Publisher and Customer or Institutions (if applicable) from time to time.
II. Authorized Use of Product(s)
Customer, the Institutions (if applicable), and Authorized Users may use the Product(s) for Educational Purposes as follows:
Analysis. Authorized Users shall be permitted to extract or use information contained in the Product(s) for Educational Purposes, including, but not limited to, text and data mining, extraction and manipulation of information for the purposes of illustration, explanation, example, comment, criticism, teaching, research, or analysis.
Course Packs. Customer, the Institutions, and Authorized Users may use a Reasonable Amount of the Product(s) in the preparation of course packs or other educational materials.
Digital Copy. Customer, the Institutions, and Authorized Users may download and digitally copy a Reasonable Amount of the Product(s).
Display. Customer, the Institutions, and Authorized Users shall have the right to electronically display the Product(s) to the extent necessary to further the intent and purpose of this Agreement.
Electronic Reserve. Customer, the Institutions, and Authorized Users may use a Reasonable Amount of each of the Product(s) in connection with specific courses of instruction offered by Customer.
Interlibrary Loan. The Customer and the Institutions shall be permitted to use Reasonable Amounts of the Content to fulfill occasional requests from other, non-participating institutions, a practice commonly called Interlibrary Loan ("ILL"). Customer and the Institutions shall fulfill such requests in compliance with Section 108 of the United States Copyright Law (17 USC S108, "Limitations on exclusive rights: Reproduction by libraries and archives") and the Guidelines for the Proviso of Subsection 108(2g)(2) prepared by the National Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted Works (CONTU).
The electronic form of the Product(s) may be used as a source for ILL. Customer and the Institutions shall include copyright notices on all ILL transmissions. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in no event shall any non-secure electronic transmission of files be permitted.
Print Copy. Customer, the Institutions, and Authorized Users may print a Reasonable Amount of the Product(s).
Recover Copying Costs. Customer and the Institutions may charge a reasonable fee to cover costs of copying or printing portions of Product(s) for Authorized Users.
Scholarly Sharing. Authorized Users may transmit to a third party colleague in hard copy or electronically, Reasonable Amounts of the Product(s) for personal use, professional use, or Educational Purposes but in no event for Commercial Use. In addition, Authorized Users have the right to use, with appropriate credit, figures, tables, and brief excerpts from the Product(s) in the Authorized User's own scientific, scholarly, and educational works.
Text Mining. Authorized Users may use the licensed material to perform and engage in text mining/data mining activities for legitimate academic research and other Educational Purposes. Those uses beyond educational use shall require permission from the Publisher.
III. Restrictions
Except as provided herein, the institution shall make reasonable efforts to inform its authorized users not to use, alter, decompile, modify, display, or distribute the Product(s) as follows:
Alter Identification. Remove, obscure, or modify copyright notices, text acknowledging, attributions, or other means of identification or disclaimers as they appear. Alter Product(s).
Alter, decompile, adapt, or modify the Product(s), except to the extent necessary to make it perceptible on a computer screen, or as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Alteration of words or their order is strictly prohibited.
Commercial Use. No Commercial Use of the Product(s) shall be permitted unless the Customer or an Authorized User has been granted prior written consent by an authorized representative of the Product(s). Use of all or any part of the Product(s) for any Commercial Use or for any purpose other than Educational Purposes.
Distribution. Display or distribute any part of the Product(s) on any electronic network, including without limitation, the Internet, and any other distribution medium now in existence or hereinafter created, other than by a Secure Authentication; print and distribute any portion(s) of the Product(s)s to persons or entities other than the Customer or Authorized Users, except as provided in Section II.
JECT acknowledges that the Customer cannot police or control the actions of its students, faculty, and other Authorized Users with respect to their use of the Product(s). In the event of abuse, the institution shall make prompt and reasonable efforts to heal the breach and notify the publisher.
IV. Term and Termination
This agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall remain in effect unless and until terminated as permitted herein (the "Term"). There is no perpetual electronic access to content made available during the term of the agreement.
JECT may terminate this Agreement if Customer violates any of the terms and conditions set forth herein. In the event of any termination of access, JECT will promptly notify the Customer of the basis for termination.
The Customer may terminate this Agreement if sufficient funds are not provided or allotted in future government-approved budgets of the Customer (or reasonably available or expected to become available from other sources at the time the Customer’s payment obligation attaches) to permit the Subscriber, in the exercise of its reasonable administrative discretion, to continue this Agreement.
In the event of any unauthorized use of the Product(s) by an Authorized User, Customer shall cooperate with JECT in the investigation of any unauthorized use of the Product(s) of which it is made aware and shall use reasonable efforts to remedy such unauthorized use and prevent its recurrence. JECT may terminate such Authorized User's access to the Product(s) after first providing reasonable notice to the Customer (in no event less than two (2) weeks) and cooperating with the Customer to avoid recurrence of any unauthorized use. In the event of any termination of access, JECT will promptly notify the Customer
. V. Refunds
In the event that a subscription is canceled by the Customer prior to the subscription end date, the following will be used as guidelines for refunds.
Electronic subscriptions. The Customer shall be entitled to a full refund within 14 days of the start of the most recent subscription term. Refunds requested after 14 days but no later than 60 days from the start of the most recent subscription term will be allowed, minus a 30% processing fee. Refunds will not be granted if requested more than 60 days after the start of the most recent subscription term.
