Reciprocal Gains in Higher Order Thinking and Course Content in Teaching Students to Argue and Think Critically

Authors

  • Annette Wyandotte Indiana University Southeast Author

Abstract

The author examines the effectiveness of a curriculum aimed to raise awareness of prospective English teachers and writers while studying the psychological and sociological impact of language use. Action research tested whether students already knew how to argue and think critically when they came to a 200-level undergraduate course. Finding that many students did not, a systematic method for critical inquiry was developed as a teaching tool that combined elements of Paul's (1992) approach to critical thinking, Toulmin's (1958) argument model, and Nelson and Angelo's (1997) approach to higher-order thinking. Subsequently, a pre/post study conducted over two years revealed significant differences in students' written performances on a common task scored by independent readers for attributes of language awareness and critical thinking. A slightpositive correlation between criteria sets was also found.

Published

2024-03-23