The Multiple-Paths Faculty Evaluation System

Authors

  • Harvey Brightman Georgia State University Author
  • Yezdi Bhada Georgia State University Author
  • William Feldhaus Georgia State University Author
  • Vincent Giovinazzo Georgia State University Author
  • Nancy Mansfield Georgia State University Author
  • Les Rue Georgia State University Author
  • Mark Schaffer Georgia State University Author
  • Art Schreiber Georgia State University Author

Abstract

Wilson (1942) wrote that "the most critical problem confronted in the social organization of any university is the proper evaluation of faculty services." Historically, faculty evaluation systems have provided administrators critical data to make academic personnel decisions. Several writers have suggested that evaluation systems should also encourage individual flexibility and provide for systematic faculty development. Menges (1984) and Aleomoni (1984) predicted that flexible systems will soon become the norm. A faculty member will be able to decide how to allocate efforts among teaching, research, and service. Increased flexibility runs contrary to recent trends. Miller (1987) noted that some small colleges and regional universities are placing as much emphasis on research as research-oriented institutions. Today there is less, rather than more, flexibility as many schools exhibit a "follow-the-leader" mentality. That is not all. Few evaluation systems provide the requisite support for faculty development (Aubrecht, 1984).

Published

2024-03-23