A Legal Analysis and Contrarian View of the Syllabus-as-Contract Perspective

Authors

  • Kent D. Kauffman Indiana University Purdue University—Fort Wayne Author

Abstract

Despite the claim made in the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) literature for over two decades that a syllabus is a contract, the courts have uniformly ruled that it is not. While there is no harm in thinking one's syllabus is a contract, there may be legal risk in proclaiming it so. The author provides an analysis of the syllabus-as-contract dilemma as well as a review of the legal precedents. Best practices from contract drafting are applied to syllabus creation to enhance teaching and learning and minimize the legal risks of student grievances.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2024-04-25

How to Cite

A Legal Analysis and Contrarian View of the Syllabus-as-Contract Perspective. (2024). Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 26(2). https://celt.miamioh.edu/index.php/JECT/article/view/442